The Non-Existence of God

Is it possible to prove or disprove God’s existence?
Arguments for the existence of God have taken many different forms over
the centuries: the ontological, cosmological and teleological arguments;
arguments which invoke miracles, religious experience and morality; and
prudential arguments such as Pascal’s Wager. On the other hand are the
arguments against theistic belief: the traditional problem of evil; the logical
tensions between divine attributes such as omnipotence, omniscience and
eternity; and arguments from the scale of the universe.
In The Non-existence of God, Nicholas Everitt introduces and critically
assesses these arguments and examines the role that reason and knowledge
play in the debate over God’s existence. He draws on recent scientific
disputes over neo-Darwinism, the implications of ‘big bang’ cosmology, and

the temporal and spatial size of the universe; and discusses some of the
most recent work on the subject, such as the writings of Reformed Epistemologists,
and Plantinga’s ‘anti-naturalism’ argument in favour of theism.
Everitt’s controversial conclusion is that there is a sense in which God’s
existence is disprovable, and that even in other senses a belief in God would
be irrational.
Contents: 1. Reasoning about God 2. Reformed Epistemology 3. Ontological
arguments 4. Cosmological arguments 5. Teleological arguments
6. Arguments to and from miracles 7. God and morality 8. Religious experience
9. Naturalism, evolution and rationality 10. Prudential arguments
11. Arguments from scale 12. Problems about evil 13. Omnipotence
14. Eternity and omnipresence 15. Omniscience 16. Conclusion.


Nicholas Everitt is Senior Lecturer in Philosophy at the University of East
Anglia, UK. He is the co-author of Modern Epistemology (1995).


To download this book for free click here