data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/33070/33070d1fe580bf8e5de53b05b68d2980e73f0d9a" alt=""
which Edward Stuart Russell reconstructed the history of animal
morphology from Aristotle to the early 1 900s-a long period of time
in which the most important and revolutionary event in the history
of biology took place, including the advent of a world incorporating
evolutionary change. And yet for Russell the most radical choice between
alternative views in the study of animal form was not preDarwinian
conceptions versus those dominated by the methods and
priorities of evolutionary biology. It was instead the more ancient
and perhaps never fully resolved opposition which, at the beginning
of the nineteenth century, saw the two giants of comparative anatomy,
Georges Cuvier and Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, facing one
another. The first championed a view that Russell called teleological
and which consists in claiming the primacy of function over form,
while the second defended, with equal conviction and authority, the
view that Russell called morphological, which claims the primacy of
form over function.